Many years ago I remember watching an alpine stage in the Tour de France and literally not able to believe my own eyes, Lance pulling away from an exhausted and beaten pack yet again, obliterating the world's best climbers on his way to another stage victory in the mountains. It wasn't just that he could do this, it was that he hardly broke sweat or looked under any pressure, and could do it again the next day, and year after year. It just didn't seem to add up.
Reading David Walsh's excellent book From Lance to Landis a couple of years ago confirmed my own suspicions (and I know this book changed your mind too, Tom). Apart from anything else, there were first-hand accounts of Armstrong confessing to substance abuse while he was in cancer treatment. He has since taken steps to silence those who went on the record in this book, including his Irish former soigneur, Emma O'Reilly (her side of the story here, "if my word is so worthless, why did Lance’s legal team feel the need to
go to the High Court the morning of my testimony for the above case so
they could sit in on it?"). He subsequently went from being an average peleton rider to (as we all know) an precendented seven time Tour winner.
Fast-forward to the present day and "the United States Anti-Doping Agency has officially charged Lance Armstrong with a violation, accusing him of doping during most of his cycling career and participating in a doping conspiracy" (full article in NY Times here). It seems they can prove he doped, and plan to strip him of his Tour victories (he hardly rode anything else remember).
I just did a bit of research to see who came second in those seven Tours, that is who would retrospectively be awarded the wins. The Swiss Alex Zulle was second in 1999, with Jan Ullrich second in the next two. Then we had Joseba Beloki in '02, Ullrich again in '03, Andreas Kloden in '04, and finally Ivan Basso in '05. Floyd Landis won the '06 Tour, but was since disqualified and the win awarded to Oscar Pereiro. Landis, Basso, and Ullrich have never (as far as I know) confessed to talking performance-enhancing drugs.
So, let's imagine Armstrong is found guilty and stripped of his victories. This would see Ullrich - a convicted drug cheat - awarded three Tour wins. Ullrich himself came third in '05, but was subsequently disqualified that year, and amazingly his placings in previous years still stand. Ivan Basso - another drug cheat - would be awarded the 2005 Tour. Basso was banned from racing in 2007 for two years. If nothing else, you have to wonder how anyone could possibly be good enough to consistently and comprehensively beat those performance-enhanced cheats?
There are two Irishmen competing is this year's Tour (Dan Martin was 8th in Sunday's stage, with Nicholas Roche 7th today) but the rot is deep, and it continues to put a stain on this awesome race.
Print this post
13 comments:
A very well put together piece, interesting thoughts. Yes, From Lance to Landis changed my mind about Lance Armstrong.
Previous, I was well aware of the EPO problem in the peloton but, probably blinded by the romance of the post cancer achievements, I fully believed Armstrong was clean. After reading David Walsh's book I did a complete U-turn and now consider the man a cancer on the sport.
Watching the tour of Ireland a few years ago when Armstrong was riding it, I got talking with a fellow spectator. His view was that considering all the positive work Armstrong had done for cancer with live strong , he did not care if he took drugs. This is part of the reason it has been so hard to bring him down, he has created this untouchable do-good-er image.
As a cycling fan, I have been very excited to learn that the feds are going after Lance Armstrong. It's very interesting thinking about who should be awarded the tours when they are finally stripped from Armstrong. I propose a radical solution, let's remove the entire Armstrong era records from the records completely, similar to the way war years are absent from the record books, let's remove the EPO years.
Interesting idea Tom. If that happens, it won't be just Armstrong who is expunged from the records.
The net is tightening. Hot off the presses today is the news that Hincapie ("Captain America", a super biker, still going strong at 39, and famously Armstrong's lieutenent for years) has confessed to doping:
"Four former teammates of Lance Armstrong will receive six month bans after they confessed to doping and testified against the seven-time Tour de France winner, according to De Telegraaf.
George Hincapie, Levi Leipheimer, Christian Vande Velde and David Zabriskie are said to have given evidence in the USADA investigation which has charged Armstrong with doping. All four riders are currently taking part in the Tour de France, but in recent weeks, USA Cycling revealed they opted not to be considered for the Olympic Games.
Today's report, which is front-page news, also names Garmin-Sharp boss Jonathan Vaughters. It is not clear whether Vaughters too will face suspension.
'Miraculously, USADA has arranged for the suspensions to begin at the end of the season so that they are able to race both the Tour de France and the Vuelta a Espana, the article states."
Complete article http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/report-hincapie-leipheimer-vande-velde-zabriskie-vaughters-give-evidence-against-armstrong.
Elsewhere, Hincapie has refused to comment on the claims that he has confessed! Weirder and weirder.
There is the suggestion that they will only get a six month ban and lined up with the off season as they have done a deal - see telegraph story
What about all of Contadour's grand tour victories, like the tour in 07 and 09. Hopefully he can be caught and stripped of them all too and not just the 10 tour.
Changing tack somewhat to the golden era in Irish cycling - some of you have read Paul Kimmage's book. (from Wikipedia) "Rough Ride exposed drug use apparently endemic in the peloton but spoke in fawning terms about Roche. Publication resulted in a threat of litigation from Roche" and later: "In 2004 Judge Oliva unambiguously found that Roche had taken EPO during 1993 but due to the statute of limitations, neither Roche nor his team-mates at Carrera would be prosecuted". I don't know of any similar suggestions regarding Sean Kelly. No doubt both of them had huge natural talent, but were they clean?
From the Times today: "Within seven hours of Lance Armstrong filing a lawsuit that sought to block the US Anti-Doping Agency from punishing him for alleged doping violations, a federal judge in Austin, Texas, struck down the complaint, dealing Armstrong a swift and smarting blow in his hometown"
Also: "He faces a lifetime ban from Olympic sports, the loss of his Tour titles and the forfeiture of the money and awards he won during that time".
Full article at http://www.irishtimes.com/sports/other/2012/0710/1224319765045.html.
Only Tom has replied. Come on lads, I doubt you have no opinion on this.
What a mind blowing time trial by Bradley Wiggins to sew up the tour de france in the first week.
But getting back to Armstrong, he has refiled his lawsuit today. Not shortage of expensive lawyers here.
During the late 80s and early 90s, I like a large number of Irish sports fans were captivated by Roche and Kelly's achievements and the daily Channel 4 highlights of Le tour were essential viewing. Martin Earley won a stage and Paul Kimmage made up the Irish contingent in the pelethon. I, like many others, bought a bike and went out on long Sunday morning spins with the local club.
However, maybe it was around the time the Tour came to Ireland it was obvious that there was serious drug use. I have little or no interest in it since, despite the fact my brother in law represented Ireland at all levels on track and road. Unfortunately the Olympics is the same - there was a time I was glued to all competitions - but now I just can't help wondering what are amazing performances and who have the best chemists. It is difficult, if not impossible to separate the achievement from the possibility of drug use, the litany of failures for drug testing in the Tour is a testament to that.
Possibly an exception to this is Michael Phelps - a participant in the "Project Believe" - he takes voluntary blood and urine tests to prove no performance enhancing drug use - his participation in London 2012 is fascinating.
Cycling have a done a lot to remove the blight of drug use, they are probably ahead of most sports in testing. However, if you look back on the top 3 finishers over the past 15 years, top 10 finishers are, by exception, drugs cheats:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doping_at_the_Tour_de_France
The Tour has always been an incredible event of endurance and stamina, it's just a tragedy that goes hand in hand with performance enhancing drug use in today's world.
That wiki page on Doping histories of Top-10 finishers, 1998 - 2011 makes amazing reading, takes for linking that.
For me there is no doubting Team Sky's clean riding credentials. I know David Millar is among their riders but I highly recommend getting his book out from the library for a summer read. It opened my mind a lot to the whole thing and I am fully behind him now, I was psyched he got a tour stage victory this year.
[im]http://www.roadcycling.com/artman2/uploads/2/US_David_Millar_Book_Racing_Throgh_The_Dark_Doping_Road_Cycling.jpg[/im]
Re the Olympics, it's time to pretend you are a kid looking at it for the first time and forget about all that other stuff. It's going to be fun.
Hoping Cavendish can win on in Paris for #4 in a row and get the #stage victories. I also hope he wins in London.
I thought a bit premature, but fair play you called it Tom - sewn up by Wiggins in the first week. I've watched the TG4 highlights every night, and although far from a classic Tour, it was impossible not to be impressed by team Sky. Wiggins so comfortable on the bike, barely moving, never panicking when Nibali and Evans attacked. Froome if anything stronger in the mountains than his leader. Cavendish's stage win in Paris was sensational, led out and set up by the yellow jersey, surely unprecedented. But it was Wiggin's modesty and honesty in his interviews that really impressed - he just seems like a nice guy. I really really hope all these guys are clean... Cavendish was the only British rider to miss out on a medal in Beijing (Wiggins was his partner in the Madison, and let him down badly). Hopefully he can pull off the win in the road race, but with national teams of 3 rather than a Tour team of 9-10 riders to set him up, he's going to have his work cut out. Wiggins will no doubt do all he can to make up for the debacle 4 years ago.
Looks like it's all over for Lance - I'm sure you've all see the articles and reference to his statement. Check out this graphic on the same theme as my original post - http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/armstrong1150px.jpg.
Take for example the 2005 Tour - you have to go down to 8th place to find the first non-doping rider, namely Cadel Evans.
I hope the UCI (world body) follow the USADA (american body) title stripping [im]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_sFI9YMq4Zog/TMW2hUW6kRI/AAAAAAAAAEc/cNcxDmk-NZo/s1600/lance-armstrong_628x434.jpg[/im]
In Tyler Hamilton's just out new book he alleges that, at the 1999 Tour, Armstrong's gardener, named only as Phillipe, followed the riders on a motorbike carrying a flask containing vials of the blood-boosting drug erythropoietin (EPO).
"When we needed Edgar [Allan Poe, a slang term for EPO], Phillipe would zip through the Tour's traffic and make a drop-off," he claimed.
Guardian
[im]http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41Bm2n-CIlL._AA278_PIkin4,BottomRight,-48,22_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg[/im]
In case anyone missed some recent Guardian contributions :
Do the people who are running cycling really want to clean it up? (Paul Kimmage)
Lance Armstrong: the whistleblowers (Conal Urquhart and David Walsh)
Post a Comment
You Can Add Images, Colored Text and more To Your Comment.Image: [im]Image URL Here[/im]
Colours: [co="red"]Comment Text Here[/co]
Marquee: [ma]Comment Text[/ma]
and more..